Friday, March 24, 2006

Pop Quiz

Cardinal Martini tipped me off to the Personal DNA quiz. I'd say my results are fairly accurate:

Faithful Inventor

About You: You are an Inventor

Your imagination, self-reliance, openness to new things, and appreciation for utility combine to make you an INVENTOR.

You have the confidence to make your visions into reality, and you are willing to consider many alternatives to get that done.

The full spectrum of possibilities in the world intrigues you—you're not limited by pre-conceived notions of how things should be.

Problem-solving is a specialty of yours, owing to your persistence, curiosity, and understanding of how things work.

Your vision allows you to identify what's missing from a given situation, and your creativity allows you to fill in the gaps.

Your awareness of how things function gives you the ability to come up with new uses for common objects.

It is more interesting for you to pursue excitement than it is to get caught up in a routine.

Although understanding details is not difficult for you, you specialize in seeing the bigger picture and don't get caught up in specifics.

You tend to more proactive than reactive—you don't just wait for things to come to you.

You do your own thing when it comes to clothing, guided more by practical concerns than by other people's notions of style.

If you want to be different:

Try applying your creativity to more artistic arenas, and letting your imagination take less practical forms.

How You Relate to Others: You are Faithful

Your trust in others, respect for tradition, and caring nature make you FAITHFUL.

Maintaining a few intimate relationships is more important to you than knowing a lot of people, and you share a lot with your close friends.

Those who have managed to get close to you value your camaraderie, and they know that they can trust you with anything; you're a good listener.

While you can usually see several sides of an argument, you often have a strong opinion as to which side is correct—the order of things is usually clear to you.

Your perspective on the world is based on careful observation, and you know a lot about how people feel in—and react to—many situations.

Your exploration of others' feelings has led you to believe that although people generally act appropriately, having clear social rules is very important to a functional society.

Time alone for reflection is important to you—you are introspective and aware of your own feelings.

Faithful is as faithful does—you expect those with whom you are close to be loyal to you, and you take betrayal of your trust very seriously.

If you want to be different:

Some of the alternate perspectives that you understand may have more value than you give them credit for—keep in mind that right and wrong aren't always so clear-cut.

While you are able to reap the benefits of your time alone, and may see interacting with a lot of people as more tiring than exciting, remember that there is a lot to be learned from experiencing things and not just reflecting on them.

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

On Target

timessquare_night_40

We live in an era in which big-box stores rule the retail scene. Target is the most intriguing big-box retailer today, as it is operates as a discount store with an upscale cachet. While I have yet to recognize any difference between the business models of Target and archrival Wal-Mart, I understand the dichotomy of perception that dictates public attitude towards the two chains. After all, I can gladly brag I don't shop at Wal-Mart while admitting that I wrote this post using a computer desk and leather chair I bought at Target.

Perhaps the paradox has something to do with store design. Wal-Mart seems to force its Supercenter prototype, a massive single-story structure exceeding 200,000 square feet with an even larger parking lot, onto communities large and small. Target, on the other hand, seems committed to fitting its more modest stores into the existing urban fabric.

In Redondo Beach, a suburban community within the "South Bay" of greater Los Angeles, Target recently opened a store that challenges the commonly accepted precepts of big-box design. The two-level structure contains both parking and retail space linked by an expansive atrium that Wal-Mart is not likely to imitate. Inside and out, the store represents a grandeur once exclusive to the "great" department stores of the 20th century while it presents a shopping environment fully attuned to consumer tastes of the 21st century.

On Sunday I had the opportunity to visit the Target in Redondo Beach. Please excuse the quality of this photo of the store and its atrium, as it was taken by my camera phone:

target1

The following is a close-up shot of the distinctive tower marking the presence of this store. Note that the white-on-red Target logo contradicts the chain's own identity while reinforcing the perception of this unit as an exceptional "upscale" branch. It was also taken with my camera phone:

target2

This store represents the innovative thinking that distinguishes Target from Wal-Mart and the rest of its big-box brethren. However, I question whether the exceptional design of Target's new units is enough to ensure that the chain can continue to insulate itself from the criticisms that have been lobbed against the state of modern retailing.

Sunday, March 12, 2006

Happy Birthday To Me

I turned 27 years old at 8:49 p.m. this evening.

While I would not consider myself an astrology buff, I'd like to share the following passage from "The Secret Language of Birthdays" concerning those who are born on March 12th:

THE DAY OF THE GREAT LEAP

The courageous, determined individuals born on this day are tough enough to withstand the setbacks and disappointments of life and later make use of their seasoned experience. Struggle is no stranger to March 12 people, who seem to thrive on overcoming obstacles of all kinds. They are somehow able to take whatever natural abilities they have been given and drive them to the limit. Not infrequently they have a strong vision or concept of what kind of person they wish to be.

However, it is important that March 12 people keep themselves directed, for they tend to be multi-talented, and as such are vulnerable to scattering their energies. Those born on this day who find themselves carried away, first to this interest and then that, would do well to at least limit themselves to related fields within one industry or profession.

March 12 people usually believe in what lies beyond the here and now -- in other worlds, other planes of existence, other realities. Yet the image they present is quite hard-headed and down-to-earth. They have a way of combining the physical and the metaphysical, reveling in the former but being intelligent enough to ultimately put it in service of the latter. Somewhere in the back of their minds they know that all of life is transitory. Whether they are religious or have strong spiritual leanings or not, they recognize that there are timeless principles and forms which stand behind this passing show. Hence, the more intellectual of March 12 people demonstrate a remarkable capacity to think on an abstract level.

Certain enthusiastic March 12 people must be careful of getting carried away by their faith in unearthly happenings. Until they have developed a deep understanding of metaphysical and esoteric principles, they will tend to undermine their emotional stability if they overindulge in such thoughts. A simultaneous development of worldly and spiritual goals usually suits them better, enhancing their daily life and promoting the stability needed for metaphysical ruminations. Balance is the key to reducing the dangers associated with such leaps of thought and action.

STRENGTHS

Daring
Intense
Visionary

WEAKNESSES

Reckless
Unstable
Foolhardy

NUMBERS AND PLANETS

Those born on the 12th of the month are ruled by the number 3 (2+1=3), and by the expansive planet Jupiter. Those ruled by the number 3 tend to rise to the highest positions in their sphere. They also tend to be dictatorial, and March 12 people should beware of this. Those ruled by the number 3 put a high premium on independence, which may necessitate some March 12 people giving up a secure position in order to freelance. The Jupiterian energy associated with the number 3 encourages March 12 people to follow their calling with enthusiasm, and the influence of Neptune (ruler of Pisces) may indicate material fortune.

TAROT

The 12th card of the Major Arcana is The Hanged Man, who dangles by his foot in a head-down position. Though such a position seems helpless, The Hanged Man is nevertheless spiritually powerful and deeply thoughtful. The positive attributes of this card are recognizing limitations and overcoming them, as well as simply being human; negative aspects are spiritual myopia and restrictedness.

HEALTH

Those born on March 12 are often prone to psychological difficulties and emotional instability. Before their twentieth year they will be forced to examine their inner state, confront their problems and do something about them. Therapy in their twenties, or other forms of psychological counseling, can be of great help to them. March 12 people are capable of building a firm basis for their psychological health through experience -- this is best done slowly, brick by brick. Vigorous exercise is recommended for these powerful individuals as well as sexual relations with one mate (hopefully both loving and intense). As far as diet is concerned, March 12 people tend to just eat whatever and whenever they like, which seems to work for them, but in cases of obesity or dietary restriction it is difficult to bring these habits under control.

ADVICE

Find a balance between your physical and metaphysical sides. Learn to trust more and to share fully. Put the past behind you and beware of sensationalism. Learn to express the best part of yourself, but do not deny your weaknesses either. Accept the whole package.

MEDITATION

Caution should not be mistaken for cowardice

<<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>>

In addition, today's Los Angeles Times horoscope bodes well for me:

Today's birthday (March 12). It's a year of wonders. Your curiosity is sparked at every turn, driving you to discover more and more. Your hometown is like a foreign land for all the new things you learn between now and June. Give in to the direction work leads you. Committing to the task at hand opens doors. The positive influence of Scorpio and Leo is remarkable. Your lucky numbers are: 6, 8, 46, 33 and 23.

Saturday, March 11, 2006

Hollywood Does Code Enforcement

I suppose I got out of the code enforcement game just in time. I can only assume that the upcoming "Larry the Cable Guy: Health Inspector" film, with its tagline of "They'll Give Anyone a Badge," won't provide the most positive spin on my former line of work. Inspectors of all stripes are conscientious, dedicated, and hard working people who deserve a better spokesman.

Then again, I always bragged about my ability to "Git-R-Done" in my four years as a Zoning Enforcement Officer.

Jesse's Song

YouTube is a veritable treasure trove. The following music video was inspired by a "very special" episode of Saved by the Bell:

Monday, March 06, 2006

Requiem for the South Central Farmers

At midnight tonight, the "South Central Farm" at Alameda Street and 41st Street will cease to exist. An eviction notice posted on Friday by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department informed the 360 families who have tended gardens at the 14-acre site that today is the last day they could legally occupy the property.

While contentious "site fights" are common in our nation's cities, with precious urban land at a premium, the story of the largest urban garden in the country is one that could only occur in the convoluted landscape of South Los Angeles. After all, the "South Central Farm" began life as the site of a abandoned trash-to-energy incinerator and met death as the site of a warehouse for the world's largest retailer. Inbetween, it served as a lifeline to hundreds of families struggling to survive and a verdant respite in a hardscrabble industrial landscape.

For over a century, Alameda Street has served as the backbone of an industrial Los Angeles that few people are acquainted with. In its heyday, it was home to the likes of Firestone and General Motors, a bit of Akron and Detroit seemingly out of place in the sun-drenched metropolis. However, Alameda Street was (and is) as integral to greater Los Angeles as Hollywood and Wilshire Boulevards; here, the "American Dream" was realized in smokestacks and steel, not celluloid and currency. To this day, the landscape of Alameda Street, replete with warehouses and junk yards, represents a city with a "working class" aura that cannot be denied.

It should come as no surprise that, in the 1980's, the City of Los Angeles found this particular 14-acre site on Alameda Street to be the perfect place to build LANCER, a trash-to-energy incinerator. The project would divert waste from landfills while providing much needed power after the Arab oil embargos and the Three Mile Island disaster had cast doubt on the future of energy solely based on petroleum and nuclear fission. In 1986, the City exercised its right of eminent domain to acquire the property from Ralph Horowitz for a "fair market value" of $4.8 million.

While LANCER was set among the heavy industry along Alameda Street and was bordered on the east by the "industrial suburb" of Vernon, the residents of the neighborhoods to the west of the site weren't happy about the project. A unique collation formed among those residents of South Los Angeles and "Westside liberals," who resided in posh neighborhoods far from the property but opposed LANCER on environmental grounds. Then-Mayor Tom Bradley, who had long relied on support from both groups, decided to kill the incinerator endeavor. However, local residents remained embittered, considering LANCER to be an attempt to "dump" an undesirable use on a politically weak community, yet another "slap in the face" from a City government that didn't seem to care about them.

In 1992, riots broke out across Los Angeles. While the Rodney King verdict was ostensibly the cause, a larger sense of injustice and maltreatment, including perceptions of the aborted LANCER project, led to the death and devastation. In the wake of the riots, the City attempted to "rebuild" in a fashion that spoke to the aspirations of a 21st-century "world metropolis" rather than the shortcomings of a 20th-century "segregated city."

In a time of testing, the vacant 14-acre site on Alameda Street found new life as a place where the impoverished, disenfranchised families of the "demonized" South Central district could redeem themsevles and their community by growing their own food. In December 1992, the "South Central Farm" began operations as a community garden under the aegis of the Los Angeles Regional Food Bank. In a bizarre testament to the fertility of Southern California, its 360 farming plots (each measuring 30 feet by 30 feet) literally "bore fruit" in the midst of an industrial district. However, the agreement that established the garden was "temporary."

In 1994, the City sold its land to its Harbor Department to assist with construction of the "Alameda Corridor." The Corridor was a herculean endeavor to bury the railroad lines that paralleled Alameda Street into a subterranean trench, faciliating the movement of goods between the Port of Los Angeles and the railroad yards near Downtown. The Harbor Department required only a small sliver of the land, leaving the great majority of the urban garden intact.

The sale of the "South Central Farm" to the Harbor Department attracted the attention of former landowner Ralph Horowitz. Mr. Horowitz had been forced to sell his land to the City for a "public purpose," the LANCER project, and he knew he had the "first right" to buy the land back if the City abandoned the project. While real estate values had taken a nosedive since he sold the property in 1986, they were on their way back up by 1994 and Mr. Horowitz knew he could build some warehouses on the site and reap the profits. Maintaining the property as a community garden yielded no profit for anyone despite the fact that it provided tangible benefits to hundreds of families in South Los Angeles.

Years of legal wrangling ensued. The "farmers" tending the modest plots, most of them immigrants from Latin America, were unaware of the complex issues casting a pall over their garden. By the time the City finally settled with Mr. Horowitz in August 2003, selling the property back to him for about $200,000 more than it had paid for it 13 years earlier, it was too late to "save" the site from conversion to a more profitable use. The "temporary" agreement that had lasted for nearly 12 years couldn't last much longer.

While Mr. Horowitz may be "demonized" as an uncaring property owner from Brentwood, he acted within his legal rights. After all, the "farmers" and their supporters could raise the $5 million to buy the property and continue to use it as they saw fit. Furthermore, the land was "taken" from him in the first place. However, it's quite sad that the money couldn't be found and that no adequate "replacement" site can be found in this congested sector of the metropolis. Due to the strange machinations of land use law, economics, and politics, hundreds of people enjoyed this amenity for over a decade only to see it taken away. We should view this story as a tragedy.

Ironically, it was recently reported that the warehouses on the property will be occupied by none other than Wal-Mart, a corporation that is currently the "poster child" for everything that is wrong with American capitalism. Framed in such extreme terms, no one can dispute that it is better for poor families to grow food to feed themselves than for wealthy corporations to store goods to grow profit to feed Wall Street. However, we cannot blame Wal-Mart for the plight of the "South Central Farmers." In the end, we can't blame anyone.

As an urban planner, I believe that every "site" tells a story. Few stories are as compelling as the one told at Alameda Street and 41st Street. It is a story of poverty and prosperity, of capitalism and communism, of politics and property....it is a story of America itself. What values are guiding our cities into the 21st-century?

An aerial photograph of the "South Central Farm" snatched from Google Earth (click for a larger image):


Links of Interest:

South Central Farmers

Save Our Garden

Saturday, March 04, 2006

Four L.A. Things


I've been tagged by Mike at Franklin Avenue with a meme that has been making the rounds in the Los Angeles blogosphere. I must admit I found this questionnaire difficult to complete.

Four Jobs I've Had in My Life in L.A.

1) Accounting Assistant (Student Worker) at USCard
2) "Denim Expert" at Old Navy on 3rd Street Promenade
3) Zoning Enforcement Officer at L.A. County Dept. of Regional Planning
4) Principal Planner for Countywide Studies, also at L.A. County Dept. of Regional Planning

Four Movies About L.A. I Could Watch Over and Over

1) Friday
2) Swingers (stole this answer from Mike)
3) Clueless
4) Volcano (stole this answer from Mike)

Four Places I've Lived All Over L.A. (With Food Memories From Each)

1) Trojan Hall (a dorm on the USC campus)...I mostly ate at EVK, the student cafeteria...unlike most of my peers, I thought the food was pretty decent, and I lived for Sunday Brunch!
2) Troy East Apartments (USC Off-Campus Housing)...I had easy access to Fig, the greatest concentration of fast food outlets in the entire metropolis, including the notorious Chano's
3) The Evanston (on Kenmore near Wilshire)...I enjoyed more Korean food than I could handle, plus fish and chips at the HMS Bounty
4) My current digs (on Serrano in East Hollywood)...within walking distance of the original Zankou Chicken as well as Los Feliz Village, boasting Electric Lotus, House of Pies, and Palermo

Four L.A. Themed Shows I Love(d) to Watch

1) Saved by the Bell
2) Fresh Prince of Bel-Air
3) Beverly Hills, 90210 (stole this answer from Mike)
4) Local newscasts (guilty pleasure)

Four Places I Would Vacation at in L.A.

1) Santa Monica (wouldn't mind staying at The Fairmont again)
2) Downtown
3) Venice
4) Beverly Hills

Four L.A. Based Web Sites I Visit Daily

1) Franklin Avenue
2) Curbed LA
3) Losanjealous
4) Mayor Sam's Sister City

Four of My Favorite Foods Found in L.A.

1) Double Double (Animal Style) at In-N-Out
2) Steak Picado at La Barca
3) Beef Sandwich and Potato Salad at Phillipe
3) Kimchee Ramen at Koraku

Four Places in L.A. I Would Rather Be Right Now

1) The beach
2) Taking a walk through the neighborhood
3) Having a gin and tonic at The Roost
4) Snuggling with Chizi (sorry love, had to throw that one in there)

Four Unfortunate L.A. Souls

The following people have been tagged:

1) Chizi
2) Keith
3) Terry
4) Cardinal Martini

Friday, March 03, 2006

A Compelling Read

I encourage everyone to check out one of the best blogs I have ever read: Working At WAL-MART, by Josh Smith of Augusta, Maine.

My loyal readers know that the world's largest retailer is one of my favorite subjects. I've been fascinated by Wal-Mart since it entered my home state of Arizona about 15 years ago; in recent years, the corporation has become the subject of debate and controversy across the country. Not since the heyday of A&P in the 1930's has a retail chain stirred such emotion in people.

While I admire Wal-Mart as a retailing operation, I'm troubled by its corporate culture. The company's relentless drive towards greater efficiency and profitability permeates all aspects of its operations, including labor policy. Employees (labelled "associates" by Wal-Mart) aren't paid a living wage, are given erratic work schedules and paltry benefits, and are discouraged from joining unions. Such mistreatement by management borders on contempt for the working class citizens who endure these high pressure jobs, living paycheck to paycheck in a "service economy" that provides few other options.

Mr. Smith worked at a Wal-Mart Supercenter in Maine for four months in order to document, first hand, the often frustrating experience of working for the company. His tales offer tremendous insight into how the company regards its employees and customers. He recognizes that while he worked at the company as an "experiment," his co-workers went through the same indignities only to return home to a life of poverty with bleak prospects.

Wal-Mart's labor practices deserve scrutiny over any other aspect of the company and its operations because it has become the nation's largest employer. The plight of the working class in our post-industrial economy affects all of us; by allowing Wal-Mart to continue to disrespect its labor force, we encourage our own employers to treat us the same way.

Previously on P.U.

The Greatest Retailing Machine Ever Devised (6/25/2005)
Book Review: The United States of Wal-Mart (7/17/2005)
Looking For Love in All the Wal Places (7/24/2005)
A Union at Wal-Mart? Sort of... (10/10/2005)
Wal-Mart Goes to War (11/01/2005)
Trump Hits the Wal (2/23/2006)

President Trump?

One of my favorite bloggers, Cartinal Martini, came across an interesting news item: New York's "Independence Party" has launced a campaign to draft Donald Trump for the 2008 Presidential race as a third-party candidate. Knowing that I admire Mr. Trump, Cardinal Martini asked if I would vote for him.

Like a lot of people in the United States today, I'm not particularly drawn to either the Republican or Democratic party. Political discourse has become increasingly divisive and confrontational, creating the need for fresh voices with new ideas that reach across the liberal/conservative "divide." I feel this country would benefit from several additional major political parties that express a wider range of viewpoints on crucial domestic and foreign policy issues.

However, in order to move beyond the two-party system, the limited political choices it offers, and the divisiveness it creates, we can't rely on "celebrity" candidates like Mr. Trump. He may enjoy name recognition and a reputation for "getting things done" in the business world, but that doesn't mean he can manage the affairs of the world's most powerful nation. He would have to offer a broad policy vision with specific, concrete goals in order to garner my support.

In California, voters were similarly entranced a few years ago with another celebrity from outside the political system: Arnold Schwarzenegger. Mr. Schwarzenegger has proven to be a disappointment as my state's Governor. As a nation, we can't take a similar risk by supporting Mr. Trump as our next President simply because we've seen him on television.